Close Menu
Invest Intellect
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Invest Intellect
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
    • Home
    • Commodities
    • Cryptocurrency
    • Fintech
    • Investments
    • Precious Metal
    • Property
    • Stock Market
    Invest Intellect
    Home»Commodities»Energy bills, not green targets, will decide whether net zero survives
    Commodities

    Energy bills, not green targets, will decide whether net zero survives

    January 16, 20266 Mins Read


    The country is dealing with two crises at once: a climate crisis and a cost-of-living crisis. Serious energy policy has to recognise both. You cannot ask families to accept permanently higher bills and hope public support for net zero will simply hold.

    At the Tony Blair Institute, we strongly support clean power and the goal of net zero. But if it is going to last – politically and economically – it must be delivered as cheaply as possible. Cutting energy bills is not a “nice to have”. It is the condition for economic success.

    That means the focus of energy policy must shift from building more power at any cost to delivering cheaper power for households.

    Offshore wind will remain a vital part of Britain’s energy future. The latest auction results show it can still be built with prices kept more or less in check. But it’s unlikely to bring down household bills.

    The big test for government is what happens next: can new clean power actually be integrated into the system in a way that cuts costs, rather than adding waste and delay? That would mean fixing planning bottlenecks, speeding up grid connections, and reforming the electricity market so lower prices reach consumers.

    Some voices argue the answer is to weaken Britain’s climate commitments altogether. That would be a mistake. But endless new targets without a plan to cut bills would be just as damaging.

    What we do need is a shift in priorities: cheaper power by 2030, and net zero by 2050. This keeps climate goals intact while making cost, growth and value for money the central test of success.

    The government’s Clean Power 2030 plan was launched in the middle of the gas crisis. Since then, the world has changed. Interest rates are higher, the grid is struggling to cope, and electricity in the UK is now far more expensive than gas.

    Ministers should act now to ease pressure on bills. One immediate step would be providing hundreds of millions of pounds in relief for families already weighed down by energy debt through suspending carbon taxes on gas until 2030, including the Carbon Price Support Levy.

    At the same time, the electricity market needs a full overhaul to attract investment and cut costs. Measures like zonal pricing could save consumers up to £55 billion by 2050 by making sure power is generated and used more efficiently.

    The UK must also modernise the grid, use smarter technology, back a balanced mix of renewables and nuclear, and stop wasting money on the most expensive options. Cutting red tape so projects can connect faster would make an immediate difference.

    Net zero will fail if it is seen as something imposed regardless of cost. Clean energy must mean lower bills and stronger growth – not permanent anxiety for households.

    If ministers want public support to last, they must prove that every energy decision helps bring bills down. Targets matter. But energy bills are what voters feel.

    approach.

    The country is dealing with two crises at once: a climate crisis and a cost-of-living crisis. Serious energy policy has to recognise both. You cannot ask families to accept permanently higher bills and hope public support for net zero will simply hold.

    At the Tony Blair Institute, we strongly support clean power and the goal of net zero. But if it is going to last – politically and economically – it must be delivered as cheaply as possible. Cutting energy bills is not a “nice to have”. It is the condition for economic success.

    That means the focus of energy policy must shift from building more power at any cost to delivering cheaper power for households.

    Offshore wind will remain a vital part of Britain’s energy future. The latest auction results show it can still be built with prices kept more or less in check. But it’s unlikely to bring down household bills.

    The big test for government is what happens next: can new clean power actually be integrated into the system in a way that cuts costs, rather than adding waste and delay? That would mean fixing planning bottlenecks, speeding up grid connections, and reforming the electricity market so lower prices reach consumers.

    Some voices argue the answer is to weaken Britain’s climate commitments altogether. That would be a mistake. But endless new targets without a plan to cut bills would be just as damaging.

    What we do need is a shift in priorities: cheaper power by 2030, and net zero by 2050. This keeps climate goals intact while making cost, growth and value for money the central test of success.

    The government’s Clean Power 2030 plan was launched in the middle of the gas crisis. Since then, the world has changed. Interest rates are higher, the grid is struggling to cope, and electricity in the UK is now far more expensive than gas.

    Ministers should act now to ease pressure on bills. One immediate step would be providing hundreds of millions of pounds in relief for families already weighed down by energy debt through suspending carbon taxes on gas until 2030, including the Carbon Price Support Levy.

    At the same time, the electricity market needs a full overhaul to attract investment and cut costs. Measures like zonal pricing could save consumers up to £55 billion by 2050 by making sure power is generated and used more efficiently.

    The UK must also modernise the grid, use smarter technology, back a balanced mix of renewables and nuclear, and stop wasting money on the most expensive options. Cutting red tape so projects can connect faster would make an immediate difference.

    Net zero will fail if it is seen as something imposed regardless of cost. Clean energy must mean lower bills and stronger growth – not permanent anxiety for households.

    If ministers want public support to last, they must prove that every energy decision helps bring bills down. Targets matter. But energy bills are what voters feel.

    ____________________

    Tone Langengen is the Tony Blair Institute’s Senior Policy Advisor for Energy Policy.

    LBC Opinion provides a platform for diverse opinions on current affairs and matters of public interest.

    The views expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official LBC position.

    To contact us, email opinion@lbc.co.uk



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

    Related Posts

    As Clean Energy Jobs Grow, Workers Want Stability And Transparency

    Commodities

    Chinese scientists achieve a breakthrough, successfully 3D-printing a metal structure under microgravity during suborbital flight: CAS institute

    Commodities

    Octopus Energy recommends ’30 minute rule’ for ‘better heating’ at home

    Commodities

    OVO Energy customers to receive up to £400 after Warm Home Discount delays

    Commodities

    Ireland could see ‘electricity shortage event’ in next two to five years, regulator warns – The Irish Times

    Commodities

    Energy demand may trigger ‘electricity shortage event’ in two to five years, warns regulator – The Irish Times

    Commodities
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Top Picks
    Stock Market

    Dividend Stocks To Consider In August 2025

    Cryptocurrency

    Best Free Cloud Mining Guide 2025: Earn Free Bitcoins with Cryptocurrency Mining Using HEXminer AI

    Precious Metal

    Ignore FOMO, buy gold this Diwali for long term gains: Ajay Srivastava

    Editors Picks

    US wholesale: Week 31 ‘market pulse’ updates available on key seafood commodities

    July 28, 2025

    Gallagher appoints Steve Parker as MD of its specialist UK property owners broker

    May 30, 2025

    Transactions financières : Une fintech propose une solution contre le souci de la petite monnaie

    January 16, 2025

    Digital Commodities Capital Corp. : Compte de Résultat publiés (10 ans) – Données financières W040 Bourse Deutsche Boerse AG

    March 27, 2025
    What's Hot

    Physint Can’t Just Be Hideo Kojima’s Next Metal Gear Solid

    September 24, 2025

    Taux : +55Pts sur les T-Bonds en hebdo, Bunds/OAT stables

    April 11, 2025

    How Bloodywood went from dodgy guitars and YouTube covers to India’s biggest metal band

    October 21, 2025
    Our Picks

    Reviewing ACV Auctions (NASDAQ:ACVA) & Future FinTech Group (NASDAQ:FTFT)

    August 11, 2024

    Trafigura warns of further ‘turbulence’ in commodities markets

    June 5, 2025

    Barclays chief says Revolut benefits from lack of UK banking licence

    December 2, 2025
    Weekly Top

    How to Use Cryptocurrency for Everyday Shopping in 2026

    January 22, 2026

    Should You Pay for Your Child’s Medical School With Your Retirement Savings?

    January 22, 2026

    Why is China renewing a push for its digital currency?

    January 22, 2026
    Editor's Pick

    Should Florida’s property taxes be eliminated?

    October 17, 2025

    American College of Medical Toxicology Issues Position Statement

    October 14, 2024

    How Bloodywood went from dodgy guitars and YouTube covers to India’s biggest metal band

    October 21, 2025
    © 2026 Invest Intellect
    • Contact us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.