Close Menu
Invest Intellect
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Invest Intellect
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
    • Home
    • Commodities
    • Cryptocurrency
    • Fintech
    • Investments
    • Precious Metal
    • Property
    • Stock Market
    Invest Intellect
    Home»Property»Real estate agent commission rules change in the USA | Here is all you need to know | WATCH – Property News AU/NZ
    Property

    Real estate agent commission rules change in the USA | Here is all you need to know | WATCH – Property News AU/NZ

    August 17, 20244 Mins Read


    PHOTO: FILE

    Changes to Real Estate Agent Commission Rules Could Benefit Home Buyers and Sellers

    Starting this Saturday, significant changes in industry rules governing real estate agent commissions will take effect, a move that some experts believe could reduce costs for consumers buying and selling homes.

    However, the new rules are complex and have created uncertainty among agents, buyers, and sellers who must all adapt to the new system, which takes effect on August 17.

    Current Commission Structure

    Under the existing system, when a property is sold, the seller typically pays a commission of 5% to 6% of the sale price. This commission is split equally between the seller’s agent’s brokerage and the buyer’s agent’s brokerage. Each agent then receives a portion of the commission paid to their respective brokerage.

    Issues with the Current System

    Critics argue that the current commission structure is outdated. Despite the ease with which buyers can now find homes online, commission rates have remained steady for decades. Research from Norm Miller, emeritus professor of real estate at the University of San Diego, indicates that commissions in the United States are often double those in other countries.

    A series of antitrust lawsuits have claimed that industry rules from the National Association of Realtors (NAR) contribute to this disparity. These rules required seller agents to offer compensation to the buyer’s broker when listing homes on NAR-affiliated multiple listing services (MLS). Although listing agents could technically offer zero dollars, the lawsuits argued that the requirement to post an offer kept commission rates artificially high. This was allegedly due to buyer’s agents steering clients toward homes with higher commission offers.

    In March, the NAR agreed to settle these lawsuits and implement changes.

    What’s Changing?

    Under the new rules, seller agents can no longer make an offer of compensation to buyer brokers on the MLS. Instead, buyers will need to directly negotiate their representative’s compensation and sign an agreement detailing how much their broker will be paid before working with an agent.

    Implications for Sellers

    Sellers still have the option to pay commissions to buyer brokers, but their agents can no longer advertise this offer on the MLS. While sellers are not required to pay buyer broker commissions, they may choose to do so to ensure buyer’s agents bring clients to view their property.

    Implications for Buyers

    Buyers will need to negotiate and agree on their broker’s compensation upfront. While sellers can still agree to cover this cost, they cannot pay more than what the buyer has agreed to. This might mean buyers need more cash on hand to cover these fees, but they can also negotiate for concessions from the seller to cover their agent’s commission.

    Potential Impact on Buyers and Sellers

    The new rules could potentially disadvantage buyers who may need to find additional cash for their broker’s fees if sellers choose not to pay these commissions. However, since buyers have always indirectly paid for their broker’s commission through the sale price of the home, the actual impact may be minimal.

    Sellers might continue to cover buyer broker commissions to facilitate higher offers from buyers who can finance these costs as part of their mortgage.

    Will Commission Rates Drop?

    Andra Ghent, a finance professor at the University of Utah, suggests that the changes alone may not significantly impact commission rates. However, increased awareness of the ability to negotiate could lead to lower rates. The Consumer Federation of America advises buyers and sellers to aim for commissions of 2% or less and to scrutinize all agent contracts.

    Potential Effects on Home Prices

    If commission rates fall, home prices might decline slightly. Lower commissions could mean sellers are willing to accept lower offers, potentially increasing housing supply as homeowners find they need less equity to profit. Ted Tozer, a fellow at the Urban Institute, estimates any decline in home prices would likely be around 1%.

    As these new rules take effect, the real estate market will closely watch how they influence commission rates and overall housing costs, potentially offering savings for both buyers and sellers in the long run.

    SOURCE: LA TIMES

    Related



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

    Related Posts

    Krona Public Real Estate acquiert quatre propriétés et lance une émission d’actions avec droits préférentiels

    Property

    Elanor Commercial Property Fund annonce la distribution du quatrième trimestre fiscal

    Property

    The eight tricks that will get you money off your dream home, by property guru PHIL SPENCER – including exactly how much to offer under asking price

    Property

    UK family home for sale for £1 and it’s not far from the city centre or beautiful beaches

    Property

    Primaris Real Estate Investment Trust : National Bank conserve son opinion neutre

    Property

    Climate change and property – solicitors’ questions answered

    Property
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Top Picks
    Precious Metal

    Gold Cup 2025 – USA : La liste de Mauricio Pochettino dévoilée

    Commodities

    Milwaukee’s first Urban Agriculture Conference aims to grow local food network

    Property

    Overvalued? Thurston County homeowners property tax appeals due Oct. 28

    Editors Picks

    Rahim Mohamed: Joe Biden headed for retirement, Democrats for oblivion

    July 21, 2024

    Gold seen maintaining upward momentum

    June 1, 2025

    Verso Energy mise 3,6 milliards d’euros en Nouvelle-Aquitaine

    March 31, 2025

    ‘The threat is never completely gone’

    October 29, 2024
    What's Hot

    Amid city hall overhaul, adjacent apartment tenants ask: What about us?

    July 8, 2024

    Zinke Calls Out Tranel for ‘Fraudulently’ Entering his Property

    October 19, 2024

    VR Resources fournit des résultats de forage au projet Silverback Copper-Gold en Ontario

    March 26, 2025
    Our Picks

    Roundup: China’s agricultural equipment sows seeds of prosperity in Pakistan: minister

    April 29, 2025

    Joyessur Agricultural Company réclame Rs 10 millions à Leevy Frivet

    March 7, 2025

    Approved investments hit record P1.9T – BOI

    February 24, 2025
    Weekly Top

    Elanor Commercial Property Fund annonce la distribution du quatrième trimestre fiscal

    June 22, 2025

    Samvardhana Motherson, Dalmia Bharat to HUL: 8 key stocks to trade ex-dividend today

    June 22, 2025

    HK takes lead in stablecoin regulation as China explores a digital future

    June 22, 2025
    Editor's Pick

    Après les atermoiements du début de saison, le Real Madrid est en passe de trouver ses nouveaux Galactiques

    January 22, 2025

    How rental income is taxed

    April 5, 2025

    L’actrice Vera Farmiga se révèle en chanteuse metal dans The Yagas

    March 28, 2025
    © 2025 Invest Intellect
    • Contact us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.