Close Menu
Invest Intellect
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Invest Intellect
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
    • Home
    • Commodities
    • Cryptocurrency
    • Fintech
    • Investments
    • Precious Metal
    • Property
    • Stock Market
    Invest Intellect
    Home»Property»Disposal of a deceased person’s property and tax exemption
    Property

    Disposal of a deceased person’s property and tax exemption

    April 27, 20254 Mins Read


    A recent decision of the Administrative Court differentiated the interpretation and application of the provisions of the capital gains legislation for the exemption of disposal of property of a deceased person.

    The tax commissioner interpreted the relevant legislative provision of Article 5, as relating only to physical persons and did not provide an exemption for the disposal of property belonging to a deceased person and imposed tax. This interpretation was deemed incorrect and annulled by a decision of the court.

    The administrator of the estate of a deceased person who sells property to cover the costs of the administration and distributes the remaining amount among the heirs is considered to fall within the concept of a physical person disposing of the property. The law does not define or refer to the disposal of property belonging to a physical person, but to the disposal of property made by a physical person, such as an administrator.

    Therefore, the correct interpretation of the capital gains legislation allows the administrator of the deceased’s estate to sell property and obtain the deduction within the scope of the exemption provided for each person.

    In the case of disposal of property, in the exceptions, section 5(1) of the Capital Gains Law, L.52/1980, provides, inter alia, that no tax shall be payable when the total gain arising from the disposal of property by any individual does not exceed the amount of €17.086, whether acquired during the same year or any other year.

    Profit means the profit of any person arising from the disposal f and includes profit which is exempted from tax.

    Taking into account the exceptions, tax is imposed and paid on any gain arising from the disposal of property at a rate of 20 per cent.

    Decision of the Administrative Court

    The Administrative Court, in its decision issued in case No.1358/2021, dated March 31, dealt with recourse by an administrator of the estate of a deceased person, who requested the annulment of the decision of the tax commissioner to impose final capital gains tax on disposal of a property belonging to the deceased, without deducting the relevant tax exemption.

    The applicant alleged a legal error by the tax commissioner, regarding the interpretation of article 5 of the Capital Gains Law, Law 52/1980, lack of reasoning and due investigation.

    Specifically, the commissioner explained to the administrator that the deceased owner of the property was not entitled to the exemption of €17.086. Only physical persons are entitled to this exemption and a person acquires the status of a physical person at birth and loses it after death.

    The court analysed the provisions of the relevant legislation and concluded that taxation is imposed on the profit arising from the disposal of property (real estate or shares).

    There did not appear to be any disagreement between the parties that the disputed act concerned disposal. Consequently, if the disposal of the property is made by a physical person, then the provisions of Article 5 of the Law apply.

    It added that, in the present case, the disposal of the property was not made by the deceased person, but by the administrator, who is not disputed to be a physical person. Of course, the disposal did not concern the administrator himself, but the heirs of the deceased and was made with the aim of covering the administration and other expenses and any amount remaining would be distributed to the heirs.

    The court concluded that, since the sale was made by a physical person, in the specific capacity of administrator, the commissioner erroneously proceeded to interpret the rights of the deceased person for the purposes of applying section 5(1) of the law, since what the law provides is that the disposal is made by a physical person.

    The commissioner’s approach might have been correct if section 5(1) provided for the disposal of property belonging to a physical person. However, this is not the provision.

    Therefore, if the disposal is made by a physical person as it was in the case under consideration, then the provisions of article 5(1) apply and by extension the commissioner should investigate whether the disposal coul benefit from the exception provided for by the law and annulled the contested decision.

    George Coucounis is a lawyer specialising in Immovable Property Law, based in Larnaca. E-mail: [email protected], tel: 24818288



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

    Related Posts

    Transcript : Argosy Property Limited, 2025 Earnings Call, May 21, 2025

    Property

    Au cœur des enjeux | Agefi.com

    Property

    Une filiale de Yuexiu Property cède 65 % de sa participation dans un promoteur immobilier

    Property

    Berenberg relève l’objectif de cours de PSP Swiss Property en raison de prévisions de bénéfices en légère hausse

    Property

    Heiwa Real Estate REIT relève ses prévisions pour les exercices clos en novembre 2025 et mai 2026

    Property

    Green Street Expands Private Market Coverage with European Self-Storage Data and Analytics

    Property
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Top Picks
    Investments

    Bill Gates-backed energy investment firm pulls in $839M for new climate fund

    Stock Market

    Le bénéfice net ajusté d’Algonquin Power & Utilities bondit de 39 % au premier trimestre

    Stock Market

    1 Magnificent S&P 500 Dividend Stock Down 31% to Buy and Hold Forever

    Editors Picks

    Ashtead Technology (LON:AT) Trading Up 1.6%

    July 13, 2024

    The Role of Cryptocurrency in Modern Investment Strategies

    August 27, 2024

    How Utilities Are Managing the Surge in Data Center Demand

    April 11, 2025

    La Commission espagnole accepte l’examen de la demande de Borges Agricultural & Industrial Nuts -Le 13 mars 2025 à 16:09

    March 13, 2025
    What's Hot

    Live: Internet outage latest | Airlines, businesses, border crossings hit by global tech disruption

    July 20, 2024

    13 Best Cryptocurrency Stocks to Buy Now

    March 11, 2025

    Economic Challenges, Strategic Investments: Reshaping the Women’s Health Landscape

    April 24, 2025
    Our Picks

    US property developer claims Iraqi president ordered her kidnap, 43-day torture with beatings and electric cords: lawsuit

    May 14, 2025

    Which Cryptocurrency Sectors Are Hot — and Which Are Not

    March 14, 2025

    NADF and NITDA Partner to Drive Agricultural Innovation with Fourth Industrial Revolution Technologies

    October 11, 2024
    Weekly Top

    La Libre Antenne de Max du 20 mai

    May 20, 2025

    Transcript : Nayax Ltd. Presents at Barclays 15th Annual Emerging Payments and FinTech Forum, May-20-2025 02

    May 20, 2025

    Kamoa Copper teste la résilience du cuivre congolais

    May 20, 2025
    Editor's Pick

    “Morocco Fintech Center”, un guichet commun pour les fintechs – Telquel.ma

    May 2, 2025

    With markets moving so fast, how can I make sure my investments keep up?

    April 29, 2025

    Lyon Investments n’envisage pas de réviser davantage le prix de son offre sur les actions de Sinarmas Land

    May 18, 2025
    © 2025 Invest Intellect
    • Contact us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.