U.S. Proposes Visitor Visa Bonds Up To $15,000 To Curb Overstays

The Trump Administration is considering imposoing up to a $ 15,000 visa bond for visitors from certain countries due to problems with overstays.

getty

The United States is planning to implement up to a $15,000 visitor visa bond requirement for certain nationals from countries with high visa overstay rates, aiming to ensure their departure after short-term U.S. business or tourist visits. This development, according to a recent notice posted in the Federal Register, represents America’s latest approach to addressing the growing issue of its unauthorized immigrant population and the Trump Administration’s strategy to balance deterrence with due process in U.S. immigration policy.

The New Policy: Cash Collateral for a Promise to Leave

According to the notice published in the Federal Register, the new bond rule would apply to applicants from countries considered to have a “high overstay rate” or “deficient internal document security,” potentially requiring them to deposit $5,000, $10,000, or $15,000—depending on the country and circumstances—before they are issued a visa for tourism or business under the B-1 or B-2 categories.
The measure is intended to deter would-be overstays, a demographic that has quietly become a central component of the U.S.’s unauthorized immigrant population. Unlike border crossers, these individuals arrive legally—often by air—and remain after their visa expires.

Overstays Now Drive Undocumented Immigration

While images of migrants crossing the U.S.-Mexico border dominate the news, visa overstays have surpassed illegal border crossings as the main method of undocumented entry. According to the Pew Research Center, as of 2017, nearly two-thirds of newly arrived unauthorized immigrants came from countries outside of Mexico and Central America, where overstays, not border crossings, are more common.There were more than 30 overstays for every border apprehension among nationals of countries outside Mexico and Central America in that year. This subtle shift demonstrates why policymakers are now focusing on visa control mechanisms, including financial deterrents like bonds.

Who Are the Overstayers And What Do They Do?

Most visa overstayers are not typical criminals. They often work, raise families, and pay taxes, even without legal status. The Pew data shows that a growing majority of these immigrants have lived in the U.S. for more than ten years, integrating into the economic and social fabric of American life. As of 2017, over 65% of unauthorized immigrants had been in the U.S. for a decade or longer; for Mexican-born immigrants, that figure increased to over 80%.

Many of these individuals entered with valid visas—such as for tourism, study, or business—and later chose not to leave. Whether motivated by economic opportunities, fear of persecution, or family commitments, they become part of an undocumented population living in legal uncertainty, facing complex and often punitive consequences.

Consequences of Overstay: The Hidden Penalties

U.S. immigration law enforces a strict regime on those who overstay their authorized visit. These include:

• Automatic Visa Cancellation: Even a one-day overstay cancels the visa and activates the “consular shopping bar,” requiring future applications to be made from the applicant’s country of nationality, not neighbouring countries like Canada or Mexico.
• Bars on Re-entry: Overstaying by 180 days to under a year can result in a 3-year bar; a stay of over one year incurs a 10-year ba​r from re-entering the U.S. legally.
• Loss of Adjustment Eligibility: With limited exceptions, overstayers are barred from adjusting status to obtain green cards within the U.S. unless they are immediate relatives of U.S. citizens.
• No Refund on Visa Integrity Fees: A $250 fee enacted in 2025 is non-refundable unless the visitor departs on time or obtains legal status.

These penalties can be severe and often misunderstood, especially since many travellers confuse the expiry date of their visa with the actual permitted stay listed on the CBP I-94 record.

Will The Visitor Visa Bond Requirement Work?

While the visa bond scheme may reduce overstays by applying financial pressure, critics warn of unintended consequences.

First, $15,000 is an unaffordable amount for many travellers, especially from the Global South. Such a requirement might establish a two-tiered system of mobility: one for the wealthy and another for everyone else. Similar proposals in the past were dropped due to worries about administrative complexity and perceived unfairness.

Second, the bond does not address the root causes of overstays. Many individuals remain out of necessity, not due to willful disobedience , but because of sudden changes in personal or political circumstances—including armed conflict, economic collapse, or family emergencies. Others stay to care for family members, including U.S. citizen children or relatives.

Third, overstays are seldom enforced through detention or deportation. The U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agency has limited resources and primarily concentrates on criminal removals. Most overstayers remain in the U.S. undetected unless they come into contact with law enforcement.

Visa Waiver Countries

It is notable that citizens from over 40 mostly European countries benefit from the Visa Waiver Program, allowing up to 90 days of travel without a visa. The same applies to Canadians. None of these travellers will face this new rule, and they will not need to post a bond. This selective application of the rules may raise questions about fairness and human rights, especially if the targeted countries are mainly from the Global South. Requiring bonds from Nigerians or Pakistanis while exempting Germans and Australians risks reinforcing perceptions of discrimination.

“This is not about national security, it’s about weaponizing immigration policy to extort vulnerable visitors, punish disfavored countries, and turn America’s welcome mat into a paywall,” said Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) Government Affairs Director Robert S. McCaw. “Demanding thousands of dollars from tourists and business travellers before they even set foot in the U.S. is not a security strategy; it’s legalized shakedown.”

A Solution Seeking a Problem?

Despite the rhetoric surrounding border control, the total number of unauthorized immigrants has decreased since its peak in 2007. In 2017, the figure was around 10.5 million, down from 12.2 million. Furthermore, many overstayers eventually regularize their status through asylum, marriage to an American citizen, or employment-based adjustment—especially in cases where no fraud was involved.

What Now?

If the U.S. government’s goal is to reduce visa overstays, there are other alternatives that could be employed. A more effective approach might involve:

• Improved exit tracking: Investing in biometric exit systems to monitor departures more accurately.
• Fairer adjudication: Ensuring consular officers apply standards consistently and transparently.
• Visa education: Making sure travellers understand the I-94 and the real limits of their stay.

A visitor visa bond requirement for up to $ 15,000 for visiting Disneyland or attending a conference might deter overstays, but it could also exclude honest visitors, reduce tourism, and increase perceptions of American hostility overseas. In trying to fix one issue, the U.S. may be creating several more.