Close Menu
Invest Intellect
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Invest Intellect
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
    • Home
    • Commodities
    • Cryptocurrency
    • Fintech
    • Investments
    • Precious Metal
    • Property
    • Stock Market
    Invest Intellect
    Home»Cryptocurrency»Banks May Provide Cryptocurrency Transaction and Custody Services, but OCC Has Yet to Provide Clear Compliance Requirements | McGuireWoods LLP
    Cryptocurrency

    Banks May Provide Cryptocurrency Transaction and Custody Services, but OCC Has Yet to Provide Clear Compliance Requirements | McGuireWoods LLP

    May 12, 20254 Mins Read


    On May 7, 2025, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (“OCC”) issued a follow up to its July 2020 Interpretative Letter 1170, which allowed national banks to provide cryptocurrency custody services to their customers.[1] The May 7 letter (Interpretive Letter 1184)[2] further clarified that banks can buy and sell cryptocurrency at the custody customer’s direction and outsource cryptocurrency custody and execution services.[3] But in contrast to the OCC’s clear confirmation that banks can provide cryptocurrency custody services, the guidance for safe and sound practices for those services remains murky.

    While the OCC first confirmed that banks may engage in cryptocurrency custody services in July 2020, related Comptroller’s Handbooks were last updated in 2019, before the cryptocurrency changes were implemented.[4] Interpretive Letter 1170 provides the most detailed guidance for these services, including high-level requirements that banks should have an adequate system to identify, measure, monitor, and control the risks of custody services. These include the basics such as dual controls, segregation of duties, accounting controls, a due diligence process, and complying with anti-money laundering rules. As for accounting controls, the letter emphasized that a bank custodian’s accounting records and internal controls should ensure the assets of each custody account are kept separate from the custodian’s assets to ensure that an asset is not lost, destroyed, or misappropriated by internal or external parties. This high-level guidance comes with the caveat that banks should tailor such controls in the context of digital custody.  The letter also states that banks should understand the different technical characteristics of cryptocurrencies and be aware that each could be subject to different OCC regulations as well as non-OCC regulations. Interpretive Letter 1170 does not, however, provide further guidance on how the controls should be tailored or which regulations banks must comply with when acting as a cryptocurrency custodian.

    The Interagency Joint Statement on Crypto-Asset Risks to Banking Organization issued on January 3, 2023, shed some light on the types of risks associated with cryptocurrency, including fraud, volatility in cryptocurrency markets, decentralized networks, and legal uncertainties related to custody practices.[5] But that statement does not provide further guidance on what safe and sound practices appropriately mitigate these risks. The statement reflected that the agencies were continuing to build knowledge and expertise through a case-by-case approach—in other words, the agencies were still in the process of setting standards. Thus far, no further details on how the OCC would apply the traditional safety and soundness framework to cryptocurrency are available.

    Until OCC issues more detailed public guidance, the safest approach to understand the OCC’s view on safe and sound cryptocurrency custody practices is engaging OCC directly. Beginning those conversations early in the bank’s journey to establish its crypto-asset custody services will best position the bank to avoid a potentially costly misunderstanding with its regulator. While OCC rescinded Interpretive Letter 1179, which required banks to prove their controls and seek prior approval for its cryptocurrency business,[6] OCC in general has been open to bank management discussions. Although this approach might risk slowing down the process, it also mitigates the risk of unexpected enforcement actions.


    [1] OCC, Interpretive Letter #1170 (Jul. 2020), https://www.occ.gov/topics/charters-and-licensing/interpretations-and-actions/2020/int1170.pdf.

    [2] OCC, Interpretive Letter #1184 (May 2025), https://www.occ.gov/topics/charters-and-licensing/interpretations-and-actions/2025/int1184.pdf.

    [3] While the OCC allows banks to outsource the service, bank management will remain responsible for meeting the requirements of safety and soundness to the same extent as if those activities were performed by the bank itself.  See Fed. Rsrv. Sys., FDIC, OCC, Interagency Guidance on Third-Party Relationships: Risk Management at 29 (June 6, 2023), https://occ.gov/news-issuances/news-releases/2023/nr-ia-2023-53a.pdf.

    [4] See e.g., OCC, Comptroller’s Handbook – Bank Supervision Process (Sep. 2019), https://www.occ.gov/publications-and-resources/publications/comptrollers-handbook/files/bank-supervision-process/index-bank-supervision-process.html; OCC, Comptroller’s Handbook –Asset Management Operations and Controls (Jan. 2011), https://www.occ.gov/publications-and-resources/publications/comptrollers-handbook/files/asset-mgmt-ops-controls/index-asset-mgmt-ops-controls.html; OCC, Comptroller’s Handbook – Custody Service (Jan. 2002), https://www.occ.gov/publications-and-resources/publications/comptrollers-handbook/files/custody-services/index-custody-services.html.

    [5] OCC, Joint Statement on Crypto-Asset Risks to Banking Organizations at 1 (Jan 23, 2023), https://occ.gov/news-issuances/news-releases/2023/nr-ia-2023-1a.pdf.

    [6] OCC, Interpretive Letter #1179 (Nov 18, 2025), https://www.occ.gov/topics/charters-and-licensing/interpretations-and-actions/2021/int1179.pdf. (OCC required that banks willing to engage in cryptocurrency activities must seek prior approval demonstrating that it has safe and sound controls over the activities. Banks were not allowed to engage in cryptocurrency activities until it received a non-objection letter).



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

    Related Posts

    DL Mining redefines cryptocurrency extraction like XRP with an AI-enhanced cloud platform

    Cryptocurrency

    How Does Cryptocurrency Actually Work Behind The Scenes?

    Cryptocurrency

    What Is Cryptocurrency And Why Is It Changing The Way We Think About Money?

    Cryptocurrency

    Delhi Police arrests Pune man for duping woman of over Rs 12 lakh in cryptocurrency scam – ThePrint – PTIFeed

    Cryptocurrency

    Decoding Digital Assets: Understanding Crypto Tokens, Coins, And Their Real-World Use Cases

    Cryptocurrency

    Chemistry graduate from Pune held for cheating Delhi woman of Rs 12 lakh in cryptocurrency investment scam

    Cryptocurrency
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Top Picks
    Fintech

    Trump Media va lancer un fonds d’investissement en cryptos, le titre s’envole

    Commodities

    China’s market regulator promotes agricultural standardization in Zambia to deepen Sino-African ties

    Fintech

    Nearly Half of Brokers Experience Technical Issues With Lenders’ Technology – Reveals Finova – FF News

    Editors Picks

    SURGE ENERGY INC. ANNOUNCES $175 MILLION SENIOR UNSECURED NOTE OFFERING

    August 22, 2024

    Gold or silver: which is better?

    August 23, 2024

    Govt proposes amendment in Packaged Commodities rules to make all information declaration mandatory

    July 15, 2024

    is it time to cash in your gold jewelry?

    June 26, 2025
    What's Hot

    AI, DeFi, and Regulatory Shifts

    April 28, 2025

    Ivanhoe peut renforcer l’emprise de la Chine sur le cuivre raffiné produit en RDC

    February 19, 2025

    16.000 morts en France depuis 2009 à cause des “moteurs truqués”

    May 28, 2025
    Our Picks

    Approval for PD conversion of former Johnson & Johnson offices

    October 16, 2024

    Chairman: Agricultural giant New Hope Group to bolster world cooperation

    February 28, 2025

    La fintech reprend des couleurs au premier semestre, selon une étude

    July 1, 2025
    Weekly Top

    Zuma Agricultural Harvest Festival begins 2025 planting season

    August 2, 2025

    Meet the 75p dividend stock with a higher yield than Legal & General shares

    August 1, 2025

    Singapore High Court rules that property ‘decoupling’ is illegal if done solely to avoid taxes

    August 1, 2025
    Editor's Pick

    L’essor des négociants d’électricité privés en Afrique du Sud accélère la transition énergétique

    March 12, 2025

    Convoy of hay and agricultural supplies rolls into the High Country from Ohio

    October 15, 2024

    Ohio’s property tax crisis is festering. There are solutions.| Opinion

    March 21, 2025
    © 2025 Invest Intellect
    • Contact us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.