Close Menu
Invest Intellect
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Invest Intellect
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
    • Home
    • Commodities
    • Cryptocurrency
    • Fintech
    • Investments
    • Precious Metal
    • Property
    • Stock Market
    Invest Intellect
    Home»Commodities»Energy bills, not green targets, will decide whether net zero survives
    Commodities

    Energy bills, not green targets, will decide whether net zero survives

    January 16, 20266 Mins Read


    The country is dealing with two crises at once: a climate crisis and a cost-of-living crisis. Serious energy policy has to recognise both. You cannot ask families to accept permanently higher bills and hope public support for net zero will simply hold.

    At the Tony Blair Institute, we strongly support clean power and the goal of net zero. But if it is going to last – politically and economically – it must be delivered as cheaply as possible. Cutting energy bills is not a “nice to have”. It is the condition for economic success.

    That means the focus of energy policy must shift from building more power at any cost to delivering cheaper power for households.

    Offshore wind will remain a vital part of Britain’s energy future. The latest auction results show it can still be built with prices kept more or less in check. But it’s unlikely to bring down household bills.

    The big test for government is what happens next: can new clean power actually be integrated into the system in a way that cuts costs, rather than adding waste and delay? That would mean fixing planning bottlenecks, speeding up grid connections, and reforming the electricity market so lower prices reach consumers.

    Some voices argue the answer is to weaken Britain’s climate commitments altogether. That would be a mistake. But endless new targets without a plan to cut bills would be just as damaging.

    What we do need is a shift in priorities: cheaper power by 2030, and net zero by 2050. This keeps climate goals intact while making cost, growth and value for money the central test of success.

    The government’s Clean Power 2030 plan was launched in the middle of the gas crisis. Since then, the world has changed. Interest rates are higher, the grid is struggling to cope, and electricity in the UK is now far more expensive than gas.

    Ministers should act now to ease pressure on bills. One immediate step would be providing hundreds of millions of pounds in relief for families already weighed down by energy debt through suspending carbon taxes on gas until 2030, including the Carbon Price Support Levy.

    At the same time, the electricity market needs a full overhaul to attract investment and cut costs. Measures like zonal pricing could save consumers up to £55 billion by 2050 by making sure power is generated and used more efficiently.

    The UK must also modernise the grid, use smarter technology, back a balanced mix of renewables and nuclear, and stop wasting money on the most expensive options. Cutting red tape so projects can connect faster would make an immediate difference.

    Net zero will fail if it is seen as something imposed regardless of cost. Clean energy must mean lower bills and stronger growth – not permanent anxiety for households.

    If ministers want public support to last, they must prove that every energy decision helps bring bills down. Targets matter. But energy bills are what voters feel.

    approach.

    The country is dealing with two crises at once: a climate crisis and a cost-of-living crisis. Serious energy policy has to recognise both. You cannot ask families to accept permanently higher bills and hope public support for net zero will simply hold.

    At the Tony Blair Institute, we strongly support clean power and the goal of net zero. But if it is going to last – politically and economically – it must be delivered as cheaply as possible. Cutting energy bills is not a “nice to have”. It is the condition for economic success.

    That means the focus of energy policy must shift from building more power at any cost to delivering cheaper power for households.

    Offshore wind will remain a vital part of Britain’s energy future. The latest auction results show it can still be built with prices kept more or less in check. But it’s unlikely to bring down household bills.

    The big test for government is what happens next: can new clean power actually be integrated into the system in a way that cuts costs, rather than adding waste and delay? That would mean fixing planning bottlenecks, speeding up grid connections, and reforming the electricity market so lower prices reach consumers.

    Some voices argue the answer is to weaken Britain’s climate commitments altogether. That would be a mistake. But endless new targets without a plan to cut bills would be just as damaging.

    What we do need is a shift in priorities: cheaper power by 2030, and net zero by 2050. This keeps climate goals intact while making cost, growth and value for money the central test of success.

    The government’s Clean Power 2030 plan was launched in the middle of the gas crisis. Since then, the world has changed. Interest rates are higher, the grid is struggling to cope, and electricity in the UK is now far more expensive than gas.

    Ministers should act now to ease pressure on bills. One immediate step would be providing hundreds of millions of pounds in relief for families already weighed down by energy debt through suspending carbon taxes on gas until 2030, including the Carbon Price Support Levy.

    At the same time, the electricity market needs a full overhaul to attract investment and cut costs. Measures like zonal pricing could save consumers up to £55 billion by 2050 by making sure power is generated and used more efficiently.

    The UK must also modernise the grid, use smarter technology, back a balanced mix of renewables and nuclear, and stop wasting money on the most expensive options. Cutting red tape so projects can connect faster would make an immediate difference.

    Net zero will fail if it is seen as something imposed regardless of cost. Clean energy must mean lower bills and stronger growth – not permanent anxiety for households.

    If ministers want public support to last, they must prove that every energy decision helps bring bills down. Targets matter. But energy bills are what voters feel.

    ____________________

    Tone Langengen is the Tony Blair Institute’s Senior Policy Advisor for Energy Policy.

    LBC Opinion provides a platform for diverse opinions on current affairs and matters of public interest.

    The views expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official LBC position.

    To contact us, email opinion@lbc.co.uk



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

    Related Posts

    As Clean Energy Jobs Grow, Workers Want Stability And Transparency

    Commodities

    Chinese scientists achieve a breakthrough, successfully 3D-printing a metal structure under microgravity during suborbital flight: CAS institute

    Commodities

    Octopus Energy recommends ’30 minute rule’ for ‘better heating’ at home

    Commodities

    OVO Energy customers to receive up to £400 after Warm Home Discount delays

    Commodities

    Ireland could see ‘electricity shortage event’ in next two to five years, regulator warns – The Irish Times

    Commodities

    Energy demand may trigger ‘electricity shortage event’ in two to five years, warns regulator – The Irish Times

    Commodities
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Top Picks
    Investments

    Why ethical investment is the foundation for stronger housing

    Cryptocurrency

    Trending Cryptocurrency Tokens on Avalanche Chain Today – Seedworld, MyStandard, Pulsar

    Cryptocurrency

    China pushes digital yuan to drive multi-polar currency system

    Editors Picks

    Gold’s cheaper precious metal peers surge to multi-year highs

    June 6, 2025

    Les 100 startups européennes les plus prometteuses du moment : le classement complet

    May 14, 2025

    Gold set for fourth weekly rise on US rate-cut bets

    July 19, 2024

    [Webinar] FinTech University: The Major Questions Doctrine: A Challenge to the SEC’s Authority – November 5th, 2:00 pm – 3:00 pm EST | Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP

    October 23, 2024
    What's Hot

    Top SGX Dividend Stocks Including DBS Group Holdings And 2 Others

    August 20, 2024

    Asus lance une RTX 5090 en or à 500 000€

    July 16, 2025

    Stock Market LIVE Updates: Sensex, Nifty trade flat; HCL Tech, BEL, Adani Ports top gainers

    September 29, 2025
    Our Picks

    BC woman loses $15K in cryptocurrency scam, threatened with violence

    February 26, 2025

    Be wary of whisky cask ‘investments’

    October 29, 2025

    Motilal Oswal explains why gold and silver may stay firm in 2026

    January 9, 2026
    Weekly Top

    Should You Pay for Your Child’s Medical School With Your Retirement Savings?

    January 22, 2026

    Why is China renewing a push for its digital currency?

    January 22, 2026

    Sabeer Nelli Discusses AI And Fintech Roles In Global Finance At WEF 2026

    January 22, 2026
    Editor's Pick

    3 High-Yield Dividend King Stocks Down Between 9% and 14% to Buy in October

    October 20, 2025

    16 Investments To Consider Ranked by Expected Return — From Safest to Riskiest

    October 29, 2025

    Deputy leader Lucy Powell says Labour must ‘stick to manifesto’ over EU customs union, in implicit rebuke to Streeting – UK politics live | Politics

    December 23, 2025
    © 2026 Invest Intellect
    • Contact us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.