Close Menu
Invest Intellect
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Invest Intellect
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
    • Home
    • Commodities
    • Cryptocurrency
    • Fintech
    • Investments
    • Precious Metal
    • Property
    • Stock Market
    Invest Intellect
    Home»Commodities»Energy bills, not green targets, will decide whether net zero survives
    Commodities

    Energy bills, not green targets, will decide whether net zero survives

    January 16, 20266 Mins Read


    The country is dealing with two crises at once: a climate crisis and a cost-of-living crisis. Serious energy policy has to recognise both. You cannot ask families to accept permanently higher bills and hope public support for net zero will simply hold.

    At the Tony Blair Institute, we strongly support clean power and the goal of net zero. But if it is going to last – politically and economically – it must be delivered as cheaply as possible. Cutting energy bills is not a “nice to have”. It is the condition for economic success.

    That means the focus of energy policy must shift from building more power at any cost to delivering cheaper power for households.

    Offshore wind will remain a vital part of Britain’s energy future. The latest auction results show it can still be built with prices kept more or less in check. But it’s unlikely to bring down household bills.

    The big test for government is what happens next: can new clean power actually be integrated into the system in a way that cuts costs, rather than adding waste and delay? That would mean fixing planning bottlenecks, speeding up grid connections, and reforming the electricity market so lower prices reach consumers.

    Some voices argue the answer is to weaken Britain’s climate commitments altogether. That would be a mistake. But endless new targets without a plan to cut bills would be just as damaging.

    What we do need is a shift in priorities: cheaper power by 2030, and net zero by 2050. This keeps climate goals intact while making cost, growth and value for money the central test of success.

    The government’s Clean Power 2030 plan was launched in the middle of the gas crisis. Since then, the world has changed. Interest rates are higher, the grid is struggling to cope, and electricity in the UK is now far more expensive than gas.

    Ministers should act now to ease pressure on bills. One immediate step would be providing hundreds of millions of pounds in relief for families already weighed down by energy debt through suspending carbon taxes on gas until 2030, including the Carbon Price Support Levy.

    At the same time, the electricity market needs a full overhaul to attract investment and cut costs. Measures like zonal pricing could save consumers up to £55 billion by 2050 by making sure power is generated and used more efficiently.

    The UK must also modernise the grid, use smarter technology, back a balanced mix of renewables and nuclear, and stop wasting money on the most expensive options. Cutting red tape so projects can connect faster would make an immediate difference.

    Net zero will fail if it is seen as something imposed regardless of cost. Clean energy must mean lower bills and stronger growth – not permanent anxiety for households.

    If ministers want public support to last, they must prove that every energy decision helps bring bills down. Targets matter. But energy bills are what voters feel.

    approach.

    The country is dealing with two crises at once: a climate crisis and a cost-of-living crisis. Serious energy policy has to recognise both. You cannot ask families to accept permanently higher bills and hope public support for net zero will simply hold.

    At the Tony Blair Institute, we strongly support clean power and the goal of net zero. But if it is going to last – politically and economically – it must be delivered as cheaply as possible. Cutting energy bills is not a “nice to have”. It is the condition for economic success.

    That means the focus of energy policy must shift from building more power at any cost to delivering cheaper power for households.

    Offshore wind will remain a vital part of Britain’s energy future. The latest auction results show it can still be built with prices kept more or less in check. But it’s unlikely to bring down household bills.

    The big test for government is what happens next: can new clean power actually be integrated into the system in a way that cuts costs, rather than adding waste and delay? That would mean fixing planning bottlenecks, speeding up grid connections, and reforming the electricity market so lower prices reach consumers.

    Some voices argue the answer is to weaken Britain’s climate commitments altogether. That would be a mistake. But endless new targets without a plan to cut bills would be just as damaging.

    What we do need is a shift in priorities: cheaper power by 2030, and net zero by 2050. This keeps climate goals intact while making cost, growth and value for money the central test of success.

    The government’s Clean Power 2030 plan was launched in the middle of the gas crisis. Since then, the world has changed. Interest rates are higher, the grid is struggling to cope, and electricity in the UK is now far more expensive than gas.

    Ministers should act now to ease pressure on bills. One immediate step would be providing hundreds of millions of pounds in relief for families already weighed down by energy debt through suspending carbon taxes on gas until 2030, including the Carbon Price Support Levy.

    At the same time, the electricity market needs a full overhaul to attract investment and cut costs. Measures like zonal pricing could save consumers up to £55 billion by 2050 by making sure power is generated and used more efficiently.

    The UK must also modernise the grid, use smarter technology, back a balanced mix of renewables and nuclear, and stop wasting money on the most expensive options. Cutting red tape so projects can connect faster would make an immediate difference.

    Net zero will fail if it is seen as something imposed regardless of cost. Clean energy must mean lower bills and stronger growth – not permanent anxiety for households.

    If ministers want public support to last, they must prove that every energy decision helps bring bills down. Targets matter. But energy bills are what voters feel.

    ____________________

    Tone Langengen is the Tony Blair Institute’s Senior Policy Advisor for Energy Policy.

    LBC Opinion provides a platform for diverse opinions on current affairs and matters of public interest.

    The views expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official LBC position.

    To contact us, email opinion@lbc.co.uk



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

    Related Posts

    Simple timing changes that could lower energy bills

    Commodities

    70000 Tons Of Metal 2026 review: Anthrax, Paradise Lost & more

    Commodities

    Study shows best way to warm home and slash energy bills

    Commodities

    UK Energy Capacity Growth Lags Global Average Amid Rising Costs and Delays

    Commodities

    Praise from Ed Miliband as community energy schemes in Walsall and Shrewsbury share £750,000 funding boost

    Commodities

    China is the planet’s clean energy superpower but there’s another country snapping at its heels — and it’s moving even faster

    Commodities
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Top Picks
    Cryptocurrency

    The future of digital payments

    Investments

    Shell investments in renewable energy drop to 8% of spending budget | Shell

    Cryptocurrency

    Central Bank Digital Currencies: simplified precis for 2023

    Editors Picks

    Looking back at a shameful year of investing

    October 20, 2024

    Yellow Card s’associe à Visa pour promouvoir les paiements stables en Afrique

    June 19, 2025

    Gold-backed Tokens Underperform While Wall Street Calls for Dip Buying in Precious Metal

    February 15, 2025

    As Trump tariffs gyrate, economists say the impact on Ohio is murky

    August 21, 2025
    What's Hot

    Here’s Why Wing Lee Property Investments (HKG:864) Has A Meaningful Debt Burden

    October 14, 2024

    le Gabon va lancer le projet “Blue Bonds”

    March 13, 2025

    5 investing trends that could define 2026

    January 9, 2026
    Our Picks

    4 experts reveal if house numbers affect property values

    October 15, 2025

    UK fintech Zilch eyes deals spree on march towards public debut

    January 7, 2026

    Melissa Bonny (AD INFINITUM) Breaks the Mold for Women in Metal and De – Knotfest

    August 6, 2024
    Weekly Top

    Simple timing changes that could lower energy bills

    February 11, 2026

    NS&I customers who’ve taken out Premium Bonds since 2006 urged to act

    February 11, 2026

    70000 Tons Of Metal 2026 review: Anthrax, Paradise Lost & more

    February 11, 2026
    Editor's Pick

    Guggenheim Investments Announces November 2025 Closed-End Fund Distributions

    November 3, 2025

    How to protect your investments during Trump’s tariff market turmoil

    March 7, 2025

    House prices – Forbes Advisor UK

    August 19, 2024
    © 2026 Invest Intellect
    • Contact us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.