Close Menu
Invest Intellect
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Invest Intellect
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
    • Home
    • Commodities
    • Cryptocurrency
    • Fintech
    • Investments
    • Precious Metal
    • Property
    • Stock Market
    Invest Intellect
    Home»Commodities»Business Clinic: Lifting an agricultural occupancy condition
    Commodities

    Business Clinic: Lifting an agricultural occupancy condition

    January 10, 20254 Mins Read


    Whether it’s a legal, tax, insurance, management or land issue, Farmers Weekly’s Business Clinic experts can help.

    Here, Nick Curnock, associate at Carter Jonas, advises on the options for removing an ag tie.

    See also: Business Clinic: Should I sell farm cottages or improve them?


    Q. We are wondering whether we might be able to remove an agricultural tie from a farm cottage. What steps do we need to follow and are there any risks in trying to do so? What should we be aware of in the process?

    A. Agricultural ties are planning conditions attached to properties in the open countryside, usually where development is not normally permitted. More formally known as agricultural occupancy conditions (AOCs), agricultural ties are permitted by a local planning authority (LPA) when there is a genuine need by an agricultural business.

    They restrict the occupancy of the property to someone employed in agriculture or forestry (sometimes including those last employed in these sectors) plus other related rural enterprises and were originally allowed to support businesses that needed an employee to be available on site 24 hours a day.

    The valuation of properties subject to an AOC is dependent on context.

    For a farmhouse or cottage/bungalow as a secondary dwelling on a commercial farm holding where there is a need for staff it would not be expected that there would be much differential with or without an AOC.

    However, if someone has a surplus cottage they’re looking to sell, then the impact on value could be significant.

    Two methods for removal

    It is possible to remove an agricultural tie from a residential dwelling and there are two main methods.

    The first centres on proving a 10-year breach and the other requires the owner to prove no local demand.

    The owner therefore needs to be very clear before they start the process what their objectives are.

    Successfully proving a 10-year breach will mean the LPA can grant a certificate of lawful use or development (Clued).

    This requires that you need to have been in breach for more than 10 years, and the breach must have been continuous throughout that period.

    An application setting out reasons for a lawful development certificate will need supporting evidence, including the planning condition attached to the property.

    If you don’t have a copy, this would usually be kept by the LPA. Statutory declarations by the owners and occupiers may also be needed.

    When you go down the Clued route, there is the potential for enforcement action from the LPA as you have identified and acknowledged a breach.

    Law behind agricultural ties

    The specific legislation defining an agricultural worker is section 336 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 which provides a broad definition of an agricultural worker.

    Formerly, Section 290 (1) of the Town and Country Planning Act 1971 similarly defined an agricultural worker for older consents.

    This means applicants need to be very careful in demonstrating a breach.

    The other common method to remove an agricultural tie is to demonstrate that no local demand exists for the property.

    This requires the owner to market the property for at least 12 months at a price that reflects the condition restriction.

    If no eligible buyer is found, the owner can then apply for the condition to be removed through a section 73 application. However, by taking this route there is the risk that someone who meets the occupancy conditions could want to purchase the property.

    As a vendor you would not be obliged to sell it to them, but it would invalidate any claim that there was no demand for a property with an AOC.

    Both options are fairly straightforward, but seeking expert advice is advisable in order to navigate the potential breach or determine the risk of putting the property on the market for 12 months.

    Every scenario is different and there are other more bespoke methods available that depend very much on the nature of the individual property.


    Do you have a question for the panel?

    Outline your legal, tax, finance, insurance or farm management question in no more than 350 words and Farmers Weekly will put it to a member of the panel. Please give as much information as possible.

    Email your question to FW-Businessclinic@markallengroup.com using the subject line “Business Clinic”.



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

    Related Posts

    Barbados trials novel wave energy and desalination system

    Commodities

    Metal Gear Solid 4 and Peace Walker have been quietly removed by Konami from the PlayStation and Xbox digital stores

    Commodities

    A Metal Gear Solid Game Was Delisted From the Xbox Store

    Commodities

    Martin Lewis explains ‘everything off’ rule to bring down your energy bills

    Commodities

    Exponent Energy launches fintech arm Exponent Energy; raises $2 million pre-seed

    Commodities

    Torit agricultural show ends with calls to give farmers modern tools, seeds

    Commodities
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Top Picks
    Commodities

    Martin Lewis warns UK households ‘risk paying more’ under major energy change

    Precious Metal

    Un paquebot de luxe amarré en pleine ZFE à Rouen : quelle pollution génère-t-il ?

    Precious Metal

    Argenta Silver Corp. annonce la mobilisation de son programme de forage 2025 au projet El Quevar

    Editors Picks

    Dubai Fintech Summit 2026: Shaping the Future of Global Finance

    January 27, 2026

    Gold surrenders intraday gains; holds above $3,1,00 ahead of Trump’s tariffs announcement

    April 1, 2025

    A Threat to Our Freedom

    February 21, 2025

    Gov. Whitmer announces $5.5 million investment for Upper eninsula Projects | News, Sports, Jobs

    October 18, 2024
    What's Hot

    Chancellor swoops on landlords and wealthy homeowners

    November 26, 2025

    Top National Crime Agency officer laundered stolen Bitcoin through cry | UK | News

    July 17, 2025

    China’s largest agricultural drone maker unveils new drones

    June 6, 2025
    Our Picks

    New technology a ‘game changer’ for stadium fans say experts

    November 26, 2025

    Why Are Your Grandma And Little Brother Buying Bitcoin?

    August 11, 2024

    Acquired.com fuels further growth with capital raise and strategic leadership hire

    October 14, 2024
    Weekly Top

    Is $2 Million Sufficient for Retirement? Experts Share Their Insights

    February 17, 2026

    Next Best Crypto 2026: Hong Kong SFC Licenses Victory Fintech, but DeepSnitch AI Is Likely the Next Best Crypto to Define Your Portfolio

    February 17, 2026

    Barbados trials novel wave energy and desalination system

    February 17, 2026
    Editor's Pick

    Biden Steps Down From The Presidential Race

    July 28, 2024

    Yuexiu Property enregistre 6,23 milliards de yuans de ventes contractées en février -Le 07 mars 2025 à 14:49

    March 7, 2025

    BNY Investments get game face on for City AM Triathlon Challenge

    August 6, 2025
    © 2026 Invest Intellect
    • Contact us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.